Filtration
is a common method of sterilizing drug product solutions. An appropriate
sterilizing grade filter is one which reproducibly removes all microorganisms
from the process stream, producing a sterile effluent. Such filters usually
have a rated porosity of 0.2 micron or smaller.
Whatever
filter or combination of filters is used, validation should include
microbiological challenges to simulate "worst case" production
conditions regarding the size of microorganisms in the material to be filtered
and integrity test results of the filters used for the study. The
microorganisms should be small enough to both challenge the nominal porosity of
the filter and simulate the smallest microorganism that may occur in
production. The microorganism Brevundimonas diminuta (ATCC 19146) when
properly grown, harvested and used, can be satisfactory in this regard because
it is one of the smallest bacteria (0.3 micron mean diameter).
Bioburden
of unsterilized bulk solutions should be determined, in order to trend the
characteristics of potentially contaminating organisms. In certain cases, when
justified as equivalent or better than use of Brevundimonas diminuta, it
may be appropriate to conduct bacterial retention studies with a bioburden
isolate. The number of microorganisms in the challenge is important because a
filter can contain a number of pores larger than the nominal rating which have
potential to allow passage of microorganisms. The probability of such passage
is considered to increase as the number of organisms (bioburden) in the
material to be filtered increases. A challenge concentration of at least 107
organisms per cm2 of effective filtration area of B.
diminuta is generally used. A commercial lot's actual influent bioburden should
not include microorganisms of a size and/or concentration that would present a
challenge beyond that considered by the validation study.
Direct
inoculation into the drug formulation provides an assessment of the effect of
drug product on the filter matrix and on the challenge organism. However,
directly inoculating B. diminuta into products with inherent
bactericidal activity or into oil-based formulations can lead to erroneous
conclusions. When sufficiently justified, the effects of the product formulation
on the membrane's integrity can be assessed using an appropriate alternate
method. For example, the drug product could be filtered in a manner in which
the worst-case combination of process specifications and conditions are
simulated. This step could be followed by filtration of the challenge organism
for a significant period of time, under the same conditions, using an
appropriately modified product (e.g., lacking an antimicrobial preservative or
other antimicrobial component) as the vehicle. Any divergence from a simulation
using the actual product and conditions of processing should be justified.
Factors which can affect filter performance normally include:
(1)
viscosity of the material to be filtered; (2) pH; (3) compatibility of the
material or formulation components with the filter itself; (4) pressures; (5)
flow rates; (6) maximum use time; (7) temperature; (8) osmolality; (9) and the
effects of hydraulic shock.
When
designing the validation protocol, it is important to address the effect of the
extremes of processing factors on the filter capability to produce sterile
effluent. Filter validation should be conducted using the worst case
conditions, such as maximum filter use time and pressure. Filter
validation experiments, including microbial challenges, need not be conducted
in the actual manufacturing areas. However, it is essential that laboratory
experiments simulate actual production conditions. The specific type of filter
used in commercial production should be evaluated in filter validation studies.
When the more complex filter validation tests go beyond the capabilities of the
filter user, tests are often conducted by outside laboratories or by filter
manufacturers. However, it is the responsibility of the filter user to review the
validation data on the efficacy of the filter in producing a sterile effluent.
The data should be applicable to the user's products and conditions of use
because filter performance may differ significantly for various conditions and
products.
After
a filtration process is properly validated for a given product, process and
filter, it is important to ensure that identical filter replacements (membrane
or cartridge) used in production runs will perform in the same manner.
Sterilizing filters should be routinely discarded after processing of a single
batch. Normally, integrity testing of the filter is performed after the filter
unit is assembled and sterilized prior to use. It is important that the
integrity testing be conducted after filtration in order to detect any filter
leaks or perforations that might have occurred during the filtration.
"Forward flow" and "bubble point" tests, when appropriately
employed, are two acceptable integrity tests. A production filter’s integrity
test specification should be consistent with data generated during filtration
efficacy studies.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHow you write such a attractive blog post, this post was too good. I love the way you write it.
ReplyDeleteEffluent filters